Saturday 28 November 2015


Introducing "Misty" the CATbot


Computer Aided Teaching Robots are autonomous internet agents that work together so that teachers can simply focus on their students.

Sunday 1 November 2015

The pursuit of understanding



The Pursuit of Understanding

 Part One - Colourful Understanding of Dyslexia

Hello fellow Dyslexics! I checked the antonym of Dyslexic and found "unimpaired". So hello to all you unimpaired as well.

Even if you breeze through spelling and reading and count yourself as one of the "unimpaired', you might still feel there are areas to improve. Maybe? You, like many perfect people, may have no cause to worry.  I've found dyslexia humbling grounding and I have to say humanizing. Dyslexic people often have to put effort into understanding. They often have to roll up their sleeves and develop understanding strategies from a number of angles. I should imagine a dyslexic person would not be a sedentary thinker. Such a thinker sees themselves as a knowledge consumer able with leverage the supply of information. Being ignorant is someone else fault. The getting of wisdom is like going to a shopping mall.


Let us now set out the laws of shopping malls
  1. Shopping Malls are not places to pursue knowledge, experience nature etc.
  2. Shopping Mall vendors will frame a sale and aim for dependency
  3. Shopping Malls are a cancer that builds an internal world while sterilizing the external world





We need a collective noun to describe a group of dyslexic people. I have never met a group where this was their defining characteristic. More over  This is a good point to begin with, it is often true that while you may be consciousness of your dyslexia or the turbulence it causes, others are airbrushing your mistakes from the picture. Airbrush is so 1950's - now we would photoshop! However, I have noticed that not only do people airbrush any mistakes, but they also take it one step further and airbrush not only the non-conforming English, the non-conforming thinking and finally non-conforming people. You can't have a collective noun for a group of people who are physically present, but you know aren't there.


This is a picture from the 1930's of Lenin (in the hat) playing chess.  The person removed could have been dyslexic, but in truth his name was Peshkov, and he edited out and in and out and so on... No one has the transcript of what was going on and the compelling logic. I would venture the conjecture, that if you came across a group of people in midair brush you would do everything to make small talk.

This smacks of good old paranoia.  Is too out there to suggest that Peshkov was paranoid?  

Let me point out that the Airbushers, or what we would fondly call "People people" are the bad guys in the pursuit of knowledge. To apply the airbrush you have to frame the picture, know who is important and who is in for the invisibility treatment. The art is making yourself absolutely essential. You have to speak up, sell the airbrushed artwork, and manage those annoying figures you have airbrushed out.







Author's preamble 

As a Quantum Physicist1 and Robotics Scientist2, I have published a number of papers. As I work in Education the scholarly article3 simply has no traction with other teachers. This year I have only published one paper on cross-fertilizing indigenous experience with efforts to link Sino and Australian communities.  I have drafts of six other papers each becoming less formal and having a greater emphasis on teaching both the concepts and also the process of scholarship to an education audience. This blog format as basically a laboratory to develop the next level of understanding is simply the next stage in evolution   I will take on board comments to improve the script.

The key insight is that I am pursuing understanding, innovation and venturing beyond what is thought possible. The majority of people are preprogrammed to sever contact with me once I cross this Rubicon5. This blog will hopefully provide a document pathway to the bridge head I am building


This article/blog will be published live, some techniques developed from building virtual learning environments will be employed. These include authors notes like these and caches of links like the reference immediately below


Supporting Links

  1. Quantum Physics - real atoms
  2. Robotics - Classroom Robot
  3. Education Paper - Paper
  4. Next Generaion Lessons + Authors history - Website
  5. Rubicon - Explanation



On understanding:

When you understand something you become aware of connections - a coincidence now has meaning. We are wired to build understanding and meaning from what at first seems random patterns. The sounds we hear as a baby form words for objects. Then in a nurturing environment these words are used to form deeper relationships that include ourselves and our vision of the future.


The thesis is the nurturing environment has lost its way at a social level. The drive and pursuit of understanding in Australian society has stalled. We have a situation similar to the school yard, where various groups claim knowledge, but indeed are caricatures of reason. The nurturing of understanding has to be rebooted.



To recap, we have understanding as the feedstock of consciousness. Data, becomes patterns, becomes meaning in a nurturing environment. The next idea is that the nurturing environment has gone in a rut operating on local horizons. This is found when tracking down misconceptions, the explanation and motivation give a real picture of a strong relation to the local environment, while the broader outlook, the more strategic outlook seem out of reach.

This is a backdrop of an environment in which the majority of individuals calibrate themselves to. The is a strong preference to mix up quality thinking with conforming thinking. Run away self consistency, as the route cause.




This cluster of blogs "TPU"  are a framework of manuscripts that tackle to how one scientist, his  immediate environment, and finally the Australian country moving

Monday 26 October 2015

Tuesday 19 May 2015

Science Diagram Leaf Cell







Science Diagrams

Chicken wing bones


Birds, Reptiles, Mammals, Amphibians all have the same Humerus, Ulna + Radius, Metacarpals, phalanges as it this line of fish they evolved.

The same structure is on all four limbs.

This is discovered by Oken in Germany. He was publicly educated years before the system evolved in Britain. He basically guess evolution before Darwin, and said the skull was a special backbone, which seems reasonably correct.


Part 2 "Sir, Tell us Professional Science"https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSLnYIkmwosr4TONv7BhHqFvtZM2Ao2Y45SXAxyV6Te2yIyh3CM

1. Humans are animals that create a complex social future


Wolves have a social future evidenced by pack hunting.  But humans are at a new level encoding information for future years and generations. This passage of knowledge is called culture. The knowledge is encoded in a group narrative.


"Whats your story?"  So important,  you get kicked out of society if you can't recite the story, name all the props.  So we have really evolved to have a single group story.  Everyone can recite it, or mention parts of it, and others can fill in the rest. I contend males and females have a different linkage to the social story as they have different social trajectories. Alot of energy is expended working people differing stories into a coherent social machine. Because stories become a program and we operate on cues we can become locked into the stories.  It needs to be fixed, but part of the story serves another function of getting individual access to mates and food.  The price of questioning a story can have short term costs.  People are locked in.

So the class is asking for an imagined non-child version of the Science story. This is okay, but science is listening to the story of nature as told by experiments, and sometimes it doesn't fit the narrative, which spells not-on-message-naughty-person-time.  Surely this is a disastrous situation. ... and it has been, is and will be.



There are civilizations that have collapsed, many struck on a programmed do loop that ran them into the ground.

Science is producing lots of really reliable gauges that are turning up on the cockpit dashboard of spaceship earth. The fuel level is on empty, the air conditioning is critical and people are back in business class partying like there is no tomorrow. Well in fact you might want to start doodling on the tomorrow part of the itinerary as in fact its all going to be cancelled. Hey, by the way can I have some more drinks as it is getting hot in here. Lets break out the Great Artesian basin mineral water!

People don't mess around when it comes to keeping everyone to one central story and we humans have really got into our heads that we have to kill each other.  You hear about ants really getting into this kind of stuff, but humans really just keep coming up with the old chestnut.  We have transitioned from war as just being an another day on the planet, to did you hear the story they were telling, it just so does mix with my story.

More to follow...

"Sir, we want the full unsimplified Science" - Science is maths in English

"Sir, we want the full unsimplified Science"

This is my Year 9 science class request.

I realize I substitute familiar words first for a concept and gradually introduce the scientific term.

  1. Having a deep knowledge of certain fields I realize the words are English pronumerals for an essentially mathematical concept.  Only over time have we absorbed the word into the vernacular

This is very true of Newtons three laws, Why three? Descartes had three, basically covering the same area with out the need for God.  Yes in fact Newton works with God, and in fact Newton believed these to be God's laws.  This conveniently tied up a lot of loose ends

Lets look at F=ma. If we look at this




That is we define the words to be mathematical concepts.

2.

Sunday 1 March 2015



False start chemistry

 Winterl’s “system”

Andronia and Thelycke

phlo·gis·ton

 (flō-jĭs′tən)
colorless, odorless, weightless substance once believed to be the combustible part of all flammable substances and to begiven off as flame during burning. In the 18th century, Antoine Lavoisier proved that phlogiston does not exist. See Note atLavoisier.

Wednesday 25 February 2015